Health promotion funding, workforce recruitment and turnover in New Zealand
Authors: Lovell SA et al.
Summary: This nationwide survey of health promotion providers sought to identify
trends in recruitment and turnover in New Zealand’s health promotion workforce.
Surveys were sent to 160 organisations identified as having a health focus and
employing one or more health promoter. Respondents, primarily health promotion
managers, were asked to report budget, retention and hiring data for the period
1 July 2009 through 1 July 2010. Responses were received from 53% of organisations.
Among respondents, government funding for health promotion declined by 6.3% in the
year ended July 2010 and health promoter positions decreased by 7.5% (equalling
36.6 full-time equivalent positions). Among staff who left their roles, 79% also left the
field of health promotion. Forty-two organisations (52%) reported employing health
promoters on time-limited contracts lasting ≤3 years; this employment arrangement
was particularly common in public health units (80%) and primary health organisations
(57%). Among new hires, 46% (n=55) were identified as Māori.
Reference: J Prim Health Care. 2015;7(2):153-7
Abstract
Early engagement with a Lead Maternity Carer: Results from Growing Up in New Zealand
Authors: Bartholomew K et al.
Summary: This paper describes the timeliness of lead maternity carer (LMC) engagement and discusses factors associated with timely engagement, using data from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal study, which enrolled a diverse sample of 6822 pregnant women during 2009 and 2010. Timely engagement was defined as before 10 weeks’ gestation. Of 6661 women (98%) who stated they had a LMC, 6012 (90%) reported the time taken to engage a LMC. Eightysix to 92% of women engaged a LMC in a timely manner, depending upon the estimate of gestational time used. Factors independently associated with delayed engagement were Māori (OR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.80), Pacific (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.86), or Asian (OR 0.51; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.67) ethnicity; first pregnancy (OR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.88); age <20 years (OR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.94); socioeconomic deprivation (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.92); and LMC type being a hospital midwife (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.60), or a combination of care providers (OR 0.60; 95 CI, 0.42 to 0.90).
Reference: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(3):227-32
Abstract